The Effect of Ownership Composition on Stock's Liquidity: Evidence from Weak Corporate Governance Setting

Authors

  • Majd Iskandrani The University of Jordan
  • Asma'a Al-Amareh applied science private university

Abstract

This research seeks to investigate the relationship between ownership composition and stock's liquidity in Jordan's unique corporate setting. A multivariate regression was used to investigate the effect of ownership composition on stock's liquidity for listed Jordanian firms during the period 2006-2014. The research finds that stock's liquidity is higher for listed firms that are owned by government and foreign investors. Nevertheless, the complex pyramidal ownership structure could make corporate information less transparent and then increase the complexity of forecasting; hence, it results in less stock's liquidity. Interestingly, the association between free float ownership and stock's liquidity appears to be positive. The study investigates the effect of ownership structure mechanisms on the stock's liquidity in an emerging market, and the findings provide some insight on how the stock's liquidity might be affected by certain ownership and control features in the context of concentrated government ownership and complex pyramidal ownership structure.Keywords: Ownership, Composition, Stock's Liquidity, Emerging markets. JEL Classifications: G10, G32

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Asma'a Al-Amareh, applied science private university

Full Name: Dr. Asma'a  Ibraheem  Al-AmarnehAcademic Rank: Associate ProfessorPosition: Head of  finance and banking department at Applied Science Private University,Jordan.E-mail: a_alamarneh@asu.edu.joMobile No: 00962795513798Phone No (Work)     : 00962-6-5609999  (ext : 1550 or 1566)

Downloads

Published

2017-06-29

How to Cite

Iskandrani, M., & Al-Amareh, A. (2017). The Effect of Ownership Composition on Stock’s Liquidity: Evidence from Weak Corporate Governance Setting. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(3), 676–683. Retrieved from https://mail.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/4512

Issue

Section

Articles
Views
  • Abstract 166
  • PDF 546